Who was the creator of the Fokker Triplane?
Fokker Dr.I. The Fokker Dr.I ( Dreidecker, ” triplane ” in German ), often known simply as the Fokker Triplane, was a World War I fighter aircraft built by Fokker-Flugzeugwerke. The Dr.I saw widespread service in the spring of 1918. It became famous as the aircraft in which Manfred von Richthofen gained his last 19 victories,…
Who was the German ace in the Fokker Triplane?
The tiny Fokker Triplane has emerged as the most famous of all German planes of the First World War. If one had to assign a percentage factor to this fame, about ten percent comes from the fact that it was the mount in which the leading German ace, Baron Manfred von Richthofen, was killed, shortly after his 80th, and last, victory.
When did the Fokker Dr1 Triplane go out of service?
Fokker Dr1 Triplane. In May 1918, the number of Fokker Dr.I’s in active service reached a peak – 171 aircraft. However, in terms of their ability they had been succeeded by the superior Fokker D.VII and by June 1918, the remaining frontline Dr.I’s were withdrawn back to Germany to defend the country from invasion.
When did the Sopwith Triplane start to fly?
In early 1917, the British Sopwith Triplane began flying in combat, so the German High Command requested that a triplane be developed for their use. Many concepts were tried in an effort to produce aircraft that outperformed the enemy.
Who was the designer of the Fokker Dr I?
The Fokker Dr.I was a triplane built by Fokker-Flugzeugwerke during the First World War. The design, based off of Britain’s Sopwith Triplane, is well known thanks to the Red Baron, Manfred von Richthofen, for being the plane in which he scored his final kills.
Where was the Fokker Dr.1 fighter plane tested?
By the time of the armistice was signed, the Dr.1 was tested by Allied pilots at fighter flying schools in Nivelles (Belgium) and Valenciennes (France), being deemed as an aircraft with impressive performance. V.6 – Enlarged prototype powered with a Mercedes D.II engine
What was the problem with the Fokker plane?
Further, the doping of the fabric and wood varnishing was found to be of poor and inconsistent quality, leading to water absorption and premature rot in crucial wing spars. Fokker’s corrective action was to improve quality control on the production line, as well as modifying and repairing existing models.