What was the significance of the Webster Hayne debate?
Hayne of South Carolina. It was motivated by a dispute over the continued sale of western lands, an important source of revenue for the federal government. While the debaters argued about slavery, the economy, protection tariffs, and western land, the real implication was the meaning of the United States Constitution.
What issue was at hand with the Webster Hayne debate?
The Webster–Hayne debate was a famous debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs.
What did Webster believe in the Webster Hayne debate?
It would take a powerful, centralized government, Webster believed, to build the American economy and keep the union alive.
What was the issue in the Webster Hayne debate quizlet?
The Webster-Hayne debate was between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina, 1830 regarding protectionist tariffs. Calhoun, was a proponent of protective tariffs; later, he was a proponent of free trade.
What was the Webster Hayne debate centered around?
The Senate debates between Whig Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Democrat Senator Robert Y. Webster argued that the American people had created the Union to promote the good of the whole. Hayne argued that the sovereign and independent states had created the Union to promote their particular interests.
What was Daniel Webster’s position during the Webster Hayne 1830 debate?
In Webster’s reply to Hayne, he argued that the southern states secede since the Constitution applies to both the North and the South. This debate brought into question the limits of what the federal government could do. Webster’s reply to Hayne revealed his sense of federalism.
What issue was at hand with the Webster Hayne debate what were Hayne’s and Webster’s point of views?
Hayne’s entry into the debate turned the issue of the sale of public lands into a clash between state sovereignty and national sovereignty, and he expounded these sovereignties in terms of rival and irreconcilable theories of constitutional construction and the nature of the federal Union.
What was Webster’s argument?
What did Daniel Webster argue?
Maryland (1819) he contended that a state could not tax a federal agency (a branch of the Bank of the United States), for the power to tax was a “power to destroy.” In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) he argued that a state could not encroach upon the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce.
What happened during the Webster Hayne debate of 1830?
South Carolina senator Robert Hayne entered the debate at that point as a surrogate for Vice President John C. Calhoun. Hayne agreed that land sales should be ended. In his opinion, they enriched the federal treasury for the benefit of the North, while draining wealth from the West.
What did Hayne argue?
South Carolina senator Robert Hayne entered the debate at that point as a surrogate for Vice President John C. At the heart of his argument, Hayne asserted that states should have the power to control their own lands and—ominously—to disobey or “nullify” federal laws that they believed were not in their best interests.
What was the central argument in Daniel Webster’s Second Reply to Hayne?
In his reply to Hayne, he implicitly stated his belief that the Constitution created the framework of the federal government. Webster believed that the federal government had the right to handle any conflict between the state and federal governments over an issue not clarified in the Preamble of the US Constitution.